Jenner

Jenner v. Murphy

Good Law
1907 Cal. App. LEXIS 122·6 Cal. App. 434·92 P. 405
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 1907Civ. No. 379.California2,366 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Cooper, J.

Plaintiff recovered judgment. Defendant Daniel T. Murphy made a motion for a new trial, which was denied, and this appeal is by him from a part of the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial. The action was brought by plaintiff, the divorced wife of Bertram Samuel J. F. Murphy, hereinafter designated as Samuel J. Murphy, to obtain a decree that two certain deeds, dated respectively May 27, 1886, and May 26, 1897, made by defendant Samuel J. Murphy to defendant Daniel T. Murphy, are fraudulent and void as to plaintiff, and that a certain judgment for the sum of $8,284.13, with interest, rendered in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco, in favor of plaintiff and against defendant Samuel J. Murphy, in a suit upon a prior judgment for permanent alimony, recovered by plaintiff against the said defendant Samuel J. Murphy in England, be declared a lien upon the property so transferred by said deeds to defendant Daniel T. Murphy, until he shall pay and satisfy said judgment. The court found in favor of defendant Daniel T. Murphy as to the first deed, and hence it will not be necessary to state any facts as to that. The defendant Samuel J.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.