Catania

Catania v. Board of Education

Good Law
1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 390·37 Cal. App. 593·174 P. 332
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 20, 1918Civ. No. 2011.California1,338 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kerrigan, J.

Plaintiff: herein by mandate sought reinstatement in the school department of Oakland, and for her salary, amounting to the sum of one thousand two hundred dollars a year, during the time she had been deprived of her alleged right to teach. In the court below, after trial, the writ was denied, findings were waived, and judgment was had that plaintiff take nothing by her action.

Prom the facts it appears that the city of Oakland is organized under section 1576 of the Political Code as Oakland School District of Alameda County, and is governed by a city board of education elected under a freeholders’ charter. Plaintiff, A. R. Catania, had for a number of years prior to July 30, 1916, been regularly employed by said district as a school-teacher. Previous to September 20, 1915, she had been a single woman, but on that date she intermarried with Gerald Catania. The Oakland board of education had a rule, adopted in 1913, which provided in substance that when a woman employee married, her position should become vacant. Petitioner having placed herself within the operation of this rule, the board of education by resolution decided that it would no longer employ plaintiff, and written…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.