Gaskill

Gaskill v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.

Good Law
1916 Cal. App. LEXIS 471·30 Cal. App. 593·159 P. 200
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 27, 1916Civ. No. 1978.California1,935 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

James, J.

Plaintiff, as the administrator of the estate of Albert Kolb, deceased, brought this action to recover damages on account of the death of said Kolb, alleged to have been caused by the negligent acts of the defendant corporation. At the conclusion of all of the testimony the trial judge directed a verdict to be returned for the defendant. The judgment, which in effect was that of a nonsuit, was thereupon entered. Subsequently plaintiff made a motion for a new trial, which was denied. This appeal was then taken from the judgment as entered and from the order denying the motion mentioned. The appeal is presented on a statement of the case.

In September, 1911, defendant as a railway corporation was engaged in operating between the city of Los Angeles and the towns of Santa Monica, Ocean Park, and Venice, an electric railroad which was used mainly for the carriage of passengers. On a day about the date mentioned, Albert Kolb, the deceased, in company with a friend named Peter Dombroska, journeyed to the beach town of Ocean Park, where the two men spent the greater part of the day. At about 12 o’clock at night they appeared at one of the stopping-places provided by the railroad company…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.