Hill

Hill v. Garvey

Good Law
1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 415·56 Cal. App. 98·205 P. 61
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 11, 1922Civ. No. 3727.California2,128 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Conrey, J.

Action to enforce rescission of a lease of real property. On the eleventh day of June, 1919, the plaintiffs executed a lease in writing to the defendant of the said real property for the purpose of obtaining oil therefrom. In October, 1919, plaintiffs served upon the defendant a notice of rescission, and thereafter, on November 13, 1919, commenced this action, wherein they claim that the lease was obtained from them by means of false and fraudulent representations made by the defendant, and believed and relied upon by the plaintiffs, whereby they were induced to execute the lease, and without which they would not have signed that instrument. The answer of the defendant contains denials of practically all of those parts of the complaint in which the alleged fraudulent acts of the defendant are stated.

It was alleged by the plaintiff, and by the court was found to be true, that on the eleventh day of June, 1919, the defendant came to the place of residence of the plaintiffs, near the property described in said lease, and made the statements and representations to which we hereafter shall refer; that said statements and representations were untrue ; that the defendant then and there…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.