Pool

Pool v. Phoenix Refining & Manufacturing Co.

Good Law
18 Cal. App. 227·1912 Cal. App. LEXIS 340·122 P. 985
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 1912Civ. No. 1057.California786 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

James, J.

This appeal was taken by the defendant from a judgment and is presented upon the judgment-roll alone. To the complaint of plaintiff defendant interposed a demurrer, setting forth as a ground thereof that said complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The demurrer was overruled and defendant answered, after which the cause went to trial. On this appeal the question to be considered is as to whether the trial court was right in overruling the demurrer of defendant to the complaint of plaintiff.

Plaintiff acquired title to a claim of the Union Hardware and Metal Company, by assignment thereof, upon which he brought suit demanding judgment in the sum of $485.52, which the trial court awarded to him, together with interest and costs. The facts which constituted the alleged cause of action were, in substance, as follows: In June, 1908, defendant ordered from the Union Hardware and Metal Company a carload of merchandise, consisting of steel sheets, which was to be shipped by the vendor from its factory at Steubenville, Ohio, to defendant at Bakersfield, California; defendant agreed, upon the receipt of the merchandise at the city of Bakersfield, to pay…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.