Blumer

Blumer v. Rauer

Good Law
1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 133·69 Cal. App. 195·230 P. 964
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 14, 1924Civ. No. 4479.California1,792 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Knight, J.

The defendant Frances Rauer appeals from a judgment rendered against her and in favor of plaintiff: A. H. Blnmer for the payment of the sum of $1,255.45 on account of the sale to defendant of three carloads of fertilizer weighing 139% tons. In her answer appellant ad mitted the delivery of 100 tons of said fertilizer but claimed that the same was not of the quality bargained for and that the weight in excess of one hundred tons represented the water, rice hulls, and sand with which said fertilizer was mixed. Appellant also pleaded that said sale was made by respondent in violation of the so-called Commercial Fertilizer Act. In a cross-complaint appellant alleged that respondent made representations preceding and at the time of the sale to the effect that the application of said fertilizer to the soil of appellant’s vineyard would double the crop of grapes to be grown thereon; whereas, as a matter of fact, instead of doubling said crop the tonnage of grapes grown during the year following fertilization decreased nearly one-half as compared with the crop grown the previous year. Appellant prayed for judgment against respondent for the sum of $2,420, as damages for loss of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.