Starlie Lomayaktewa v. Stanley K. Hathaway, and Arizona Public Service Company, Intervenors-Appellees

Good Law
520 F.2d 1324
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 18, 197573-2132California1,092 words

Opinion

Opinion

Orrick, J.

On June 6, 1966, the Hopi Tribe of Arizona leased to the Peabody Coal Com pany’s predecessor in interest a strip of land for a term of ten years. The land, known as the Black Mesa, was owned jointly with the Navajo Indian Tribe.

Appellants, “Kikmongwis” or village leaders of the “traditional Hopi” (i. e., spiritualistic) faction, who brought this action in 1971 to void the lease, appeal from an order of the District Court of Arizona dismissing the action for the failure of appellants to join either the Hopi Tribe, the Navajo Tribe, or the United States as indispensable parties. For the reasons hereinbelow set forth, we affirm the order of the District Court dismissing the action.

At the heart of the controversy is the question whether the Hopi Tribe, the Navajo Tribe and the United States, or any of them, is an indispensable party to this action to cancel the lease under Rule 19(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Inasmuch as we hold that the Hopi Tribe, as lessor, is an indispensable party to the action and cannot be joined because of its sovereign immunity, we need not reach the question whether the Navajo Tribe and/or the United States are indispensable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.