Dunphy

Dunphy v. Superior Court

Good Law
137 Cal. App. 248·1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 838·30 P.2d 427
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 8, 1934Docket No. 9534.California148 words

Lead Opinion

Stephens, J.

The effective part of an order issued out of the United States District Court, Southern District, California, Central Division, is as follows:

The superior court action mentioned in the quoted order proceeded to judgment and process was about to issue, when petitioners—defendants in both the municipal and superior court cases—asked us to grant our writ of prohibition against the issuance of such process, contending that the order of the District Court was authority therefor. Upon an adversary hearing we made our order denying the writ.

We think it is clear that the District Court’s order did not affect nor purport to affect the superior court or the action in the superior court at all.

Craig, J., concurred.

An application by petitioners to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on April 19, 1934.