Giuffre

Giuffre v. Lauricella

Good Law
1914 Cal. App. LEXIS 353·25 Cal. App. 422·143 P. 1061
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 1914Civ. No. 1223.California4,073 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hart, J.

This is an action in partition. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is the owner of an undivided one-half interest in fee-simple in a certain lot (specifically described in the complaint) situated on Tremont Avenue, in the city of San Francisco, and that the defendants are each of them the owner of an undivided one-quarter interest in fee-simple in said real property; that the plaintiff is the owner of an undivided three-quarters interest in fee-simple in a certain lot (also specifically described in the complaint) situated on Oak Street, in said city, and that the- defendants are each of them the owner of an undivided one-eighth interest in fee-simple in said last mentioned lot. It is alleged that said two parcels of property cannot be divided in kind without great disadvantage and loss to the owners thereof, and that it is, therefore, to the best interests of all the parties to this action that both of said pieces of property be sold separately, and the proceeds divided among the parties to the action, etc.

The answer denies that the plaintiff is the owner of an undivided one-half interest in fee-simple in the Tremont Avenue property, denies that she is the owner of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.