Reed

Reed v. Cornell

Good Law
1921 Cal. App. LEXIS 388·54 Cal. App. 179·201 P. 608
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 1921Civ. No. 3803.California850 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Waste, J.

The plaintiff, as assignee, brought this action to recover the possession of- a certain piano. He alleged that the defendant had entered into an agreement with the Heine Piano Company, plaintiff’s assignor, for the purchase of the instrument; that payment had not been made as required by -the contract; that by reason of the violation of the terms of the agreement, plaintiff was entitled' to a return of the piano. The defendant denied any indebtedness, and alleged that the piano had been fully paid for, and asserted title in herself. Judgment was entered for the defendant from which the plaintiff has appealed.

The contract for the sale of the piano provided for an initial payment of $40 upon the signing of the agreement, and monthly payments of $10 each, until the whole amount of $458, the purchase price, together with interest, had been paid. According to the plaintiff’s theory the defendant was in arrears $147.63, plus some additional interest, at the time of the trial. The defendant testified that she made payments on the contract until the sum of $185 had been paid. Becoming tired of making installment payments, she asked to be allowed to settle the contract in full. Her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.