Pease

Pease v. Fitzgerald

Good Law
31 Cal. App. 727·161 P. 506
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 25, 1916Civ. No. 1921.California875 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Richards, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action brought to recover the sum of one thousand dollars and interest alleged to be due upon the promissory note of the defendant, J. F. Fitzgerald, and from an order denying said defendant’s motion for a new trial.

The facts out of which the action arose were these: On the eighth day of February, 1912, the defendant, J. F. Fitzgerald, executed and delivered to the California Mail Order House, a corporation, a promissory note for the sum of one thousand dollars as the purchase price of one thousand shares of its capital stock for which he subscribed on that day. The transaction was conducted on behalf of the corporation by one Hugh Wyncoop, as its agent, who is alleged by the said defendant Fitzgerald to have made to him certain false and fraudulent representations as to the assets and solvency of the corporation. The said defendant, however, at the time of making his said subscription, signed a memorandum attached thereto to the effect that his subscription was based upon the printed literature and printed statements of the corporation, and that no representations made by its agents not in accordance therewith should…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.