Cunningham

Cunningham v. Reynolds

Good Law
133 Cal. App. 148·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 541·23 P.2d 837
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 1, 1933Docket No. 4934.California803 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Pullen, J.

Petitioner herein was the owner of certain sheep which strayed upon the lands of respondent. Acting under the Estray Law, respondent thereupon seized the sheep upon his lands and has held the same pending the payment of such damages, expenses and costs as may have been incurred. A few days after the sheep were taken up, petitioner tendered to respondent the sum of $35 as payment for the damages, expenses and costs incurred, but respondent declined to accept that sum and refused to deliver up the sheep to petitioner, and proceeded to record and publish notice as required by law for the sale thereof under the Estray Law. Thereupon, petitioner as plaintiff filed an action against respondent in claim and delivery. Respondent answered, and upon the trial of the issues raised, judgment was entered in favor of respondent for the sum of $1,026.05, being the amount found by the court as damages, costs and expenses incurred by respondent, and further directing if the sum were not paid within ten days after the entry of judgment, the sheriff proceed to sell said sheep at public auction as provided by law.

Plaintiff, upon the entry of judgment, gave notice of appeal and in time the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.