Martha Washington Council No. 2 v. Superior Court

Good Law
1915 Cal. App. LEXIS 439·29 Cal. App. 45·154 P. 298
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 23, 1915Civ. No. 1768.California1,138 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kerrigan, J.

In this proceeding the petitioners seek the issuance of a writ of mandate to compel the respondent to vachte a certain order made by it dismissing an appeal taken by the petitioners from a judgment rendered in an action tried in the justice’s court. Such judgment was entered on the thirty-first day of December, 1914, in favor of one E. F. Trimble, the plaintiff therein, against the petitioners here, who were the defendants in that action. Thereafter and on the thirtieth day of January, 1915, the petitioners filed and served a notice of appeal from the judgment of the justice’s court, and on the same day filed an undertaking on appeal, and served notice on the plaintiff therein of the filing thereof. Subsequently, to wit, On February 3,1915, the plaintiff excepted to the sufficiency of the sureties named in the undertaking. Fearing that said undertaking was defective because of the omission of the word “house” in the expression “is a householder” in that part of the bond referring to the qualifications of the sureties, the petitioners made no attempt to have the sureties on that bond justify, but on February 4th filed a second undertaking on appeal in which the omission was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.