Gursky

Gursky v. Rosenberg

Good Law
105 Cal. App. 410·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 780·287 P. 575
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 29, 1930Docket No. 7010.California1,390 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of nonsuit.

The action was commenced on December 14, 1926, to recover the sum of $4,889.50 with interest thereon from April 13, 1926, on which date the plaintiff paid the amount to the San Francisco Bank, a corporation.

According to the complaint the plaintiff and Nathan Bronstein with their wives on November 9, 1920, executed to the bank their note for $8,000, payable one year after date, with interest, and secured the same by a trust deed of certain real property owned by them. The note provided that “in case any change is made in the title to all or any part of the property described in the deed of trust securing this note the whole of said principal sum shall forthwith become due and payable at the election of the holder of the note.” It was alleged that on August 4, 1921, the above-named owners of the property conveyed by grant deed to Sadie S. Gunzberger; that as part of the consideration the grantee agreed to pay the above note, the deed providing that the same was made “subject to deed of trust in the sum of $8,000”; that on November 10, 1921, Sadie S. Gunzberger and her husband executed a grant deed, conveying the same property to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.