Eiseman

People v. Eiseman

Good Law
1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 142·69 Cal. App. 143·230 P. 669
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 7, 1924Crim. No. 1206.California1,641 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sure, J.

Application of defendant and appellant J. J. E'iseman for reduction of bail on habeas corpus. Defendant Eiseman and three others were tried and convicted by jury of the crime of felony upon an indictment charging a conspiracy to violate the provisions of the Corporate Securities Act (Stats. 1917, p. 673); in the same indictment the defendants were also' accused in seven counts of the crime of felony for actual completed violations of the act, and defendant Eiseman was also convicted upon each of these counts. Judgment was pronounced against defendant Eiseman and he was sentenced to imprisonment in the state prison at San Quentin upon his conviction on each, count, sentences to run consecutively. The act provides that punishment for violation of its provisions shall he by imprisonment in the stale prison not exceeding five years, or in a county jail not exceeding two years, or by a fine not exceeding five thousand dollars, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Defendant Eiseman made immediate application to the trial court for bail pending appeal. Bail was fixed in the sum of forty' thousand dollars and the defendant was soon released upon bail. Later defendant was surrendered by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.