Estate of Highley

Good Law
1923 Cal. App. LEXIS 261·64 Cal. App. 664·222 P. 626·222 P.2d 626
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 7, 1923Civ. No. 4450.California1,464 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

This is a contest of the will of Lottie E. Higley, deceased, brought by Belle M. Hurley, a daughter, contestant and appellant, against Ida E. Johnston, proponent and respondent, on the ground of undue influence on the part of proponent. The trial court ordered a nonsuit and entered judgment accordingly, and this appeal is from said judgment. [1] The judgment of nonsuit was properly granted. Neither of the subscribing witnesses to the will was called as a witness in the case, nor was any other person present *Page 666 at the execution of the will called to testify on behalf of the contestant, nor was there any testimony that the proponent or any other person had directly or indirectly influenced or attempted to influence the decedent in the making of her will or in the disposition of her property. The proponent of the will, Ida E. Johnston, was called on behalf of the contestant and testified that she was not present at the execution of her mother's will; that she had never made any suggestion to her mother as to the manner in which, or the persons to whom, the decedent should leave her property; that her mother had never indicated to her, prior to the execution of said will, how…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.