Moran

Hobbs, Wall & Co. v. Moran

Good Law
109 Cal. App. 316·293 P. 145
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 1, 1930Docket No. 4044.California1,511 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Thompson, J.

This an appeal from a judgment refusing to grant a writ of mandate to compel the treasurer of Crescent City to cash warrants which were issued by the city in payment for supplies purchased from the petitioner.

The appellant is a corporation engaged in a general merchandise business at Crescent City. The respondent was the treasurer of that city. Leo A. Dressier was a member of the city council. He was also employed on a salary as the manager of the mercantile business. He was not a stockholder in the corporation and had no direct pecuniary interest in it. He merely acted as the agent and manager thereof. During the time Dressier’s relationship existed as manager of the business and member of the council the city purchased from the petitioner merchandise and supplies of the value of $249.66. Four claims were duly presented to the city for payment of these bills. They were approved and ordered to be paid by the council. Dressier participated in this action of the council, voting to pay the claims. Warrants were accordingly issued and presented for payment to the treasurer by the petitioner. Payment of these warrants was refused. This action was then commenced to procure a writ of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.