Elliott

Elliott v. Van Delinder

Good Law
1926 Cal. App. LEXIS 429·77 Cal. App. 716·247 P. 523
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 1, 1926Docket No. 5077.California962 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Works, J.

Petitioner is a township justice of the peace. During his incumbency of that office he also held an employment with the department of engineering of the state, under which employment his duties were to obtain rights of way for the construction and installation of certain state highways. He has been engaged in the discharge of the duties of the employment and has received for his labors in that behalf a certain salary from the state treasury. The auditor of the county in which petitioner holds his office as justice of the peace issued to him a warrant for his salary as justice, for a month during which he had exercised his employment under the department of engineering and for which he had been paid his salary by the state. Petitioner presented the warrant to defendant, the county treasurer of the county, and defendant refused to pay it. Petitioner then filed in the superior court his petition for a writ of mandate requiring defendant to make the payment. An alternative writ issued, defendant answered and the proceeding came on for trial on an agreed statement of facts. Judgment was rendered directing the issuance of a peremptory writ and defendant appeals.

Section 1 of article…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.