Wehner

Wehner v. Bauer

Good Law
10 Cal. App. 171·1909 Cal. App. LEXIS 268·101 P. 417
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 4, 1909Civ. No. 530.California483 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Cooper, J.

This action was brought to recover upon a promissory note for $1,000, dated September 30, 1902, a copy of which is set forth in the complaint. The answer of the defendant contained no denial as to the due execution and delivery of the promissory note, but alleged in effect that the note was executed without consideration. The case was submitted upon the evidence of plaintiff, and judgment entered in favor of defendant. The court afterward, upon due consideration, granted the motion of plaintiff for a new trial upon the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment. This appeal is from the order so made granting a new trial.

In our opinion the court was justified in granting the new trial. The plaintiff had a promissory note duly made and delivered by defendant to him. Defendant had paid $30 interest on the note up to March 1, 1903. The law raises the presumption that the promissory note was given for a consideration. The burden was upon the defendant to show that there was no consideration for such note. The evidence of plaintiff tends to show that the defendant had, by reason of certain business matters, used $25,000 of plaintiff’s money for about seven…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.