Orekar

Orekar v. Lager

Good Law
122 Cal. App. 370·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 1087·10 P.2d 178
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 6, 1932Docket No. 8404.California1,572 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Tuttle, J.

This action was brought to annul and cancel a deed of trust. Judgment went for plaintiffs, and the appeal is prosecuted from said judgment.

On June 17, 1927, one Tony Ownes filed a suit against respondents herein and Pacific Coast Apartment Builders Corporation, seeking to set aside a deed from respondents to said corporation, upon the ground that the same was executed for the purpose of defrauding plaintiff, a creditor. Upon the same day the plaintiff in said action duly filed for record a lis pendens, giving notice of the pendency of the action.

On November 18, 1927, respondents herein filed an amended answer and cross-complaint in said action, seeking to set aside as fraudulent a deed whereby they had conveyed said real property to said corporation. The cause of action was alleged false representations made by Anton Usik and the said corporation, who were named as cross-defendants. No lis pendens was filed by the cross-complainants.

On December 29, 1927, Pacific Coast Apartment Builders Corporation executed a deed of trust covering said property, to secure the payment of the sum of $2,200. Appellant herein is the grantee and assignee of the beneficiary under said deed of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.