Ingold

Ingold v. Daly Bank & Trust Co.

Good Law
101 Cal. App. 579·1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 977·281 P. 1075
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 29, 1929Docket No. 5551.California794 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Craig, J.

On November 19, 1923, the respondent Daly Bank & Trust Company of Anaconda, Montana, transmitted to respondent Charles E. Sackett, at Los Angeles, California, its draft on the Wells Fargo Nevada National Bank of San Francisco, California, for $1,000. On November 23, 1923, the payee indorsed the same to respondent N. M. Hayter,- who in-turn indorsed it to B. F. Ingold, appellant herein, and, after deposit for collection by the latter, payment thereof was stopped. The appellant instituted this action against the respondents for the amount represented by said draft, and, judgment having been rendered in favor of the defendants, he appealed.

Much is said in the briefs on the subject of alleged participation by Ingold in deception and fraud practiced upon Sackett concerning the value, or lack of it, of the stock in question, and other matters whose consideration is made unnecessary by the findings” upon the issues vital to a determination of this appeal. The judgment cannot be1 upheld unless the findings of fact warrant it. We shall therefore quote all of the findings, which, of course, contain a story of the transaction in dispute as found by the trial court. They are as follows:

It…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.