In Re McNamee

Good Law
131 Cal. App. 30·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 603·20 P.2d 722
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 4, 1933Docket No. 1004.California761 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

On the fifteenth day of May, 1929, respondent, as petitioner, filed an application to register, under the Land Title Law, his land described as "Lot `A' of Tract No. 10573, in the County of Los Angeles, State of California, as per map recorded in book 159, page 10 of maps, in the office of the recorder of said county, constituting one parcel of land." The petition contains the usual averments in actions of this character. The appellants are named therein as adjoining property owners. And likewise the separate answers of these appellants contain the usual denials and averments in actions of this character. There is no question of title involved. This is strictly a boundary line case. This case was submitted to a referee for hearing. The referee filed his report finding for respondent. The appellants filed their exceptions to this report. The trial court, after hearing arguments of respective counsel, approved the report as filed and rendered judgment in favor of respondent. Appellants contend that there is no evidence in the record to support the following finding: "The contestant Allison in 1917 procured a decree of this court registering the land which he now owns. The county…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.