Sroth

Sroth v. Laguens

Good Law
129 Cal. App. 67·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 1012·18 P.2d 406
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 1933Docket No. 8721.California364 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Spence, J.

This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial.

The judgment was entered in favor of appellants on January 21, 1930. No written notice of entry of judgment was given to counsel for respondents until May 28, 1930, when a letter was received by him from counsel for appellants. This letter called attention to the judgment in the above-entitled cause and stated counsel’s contention that the judgment had become final despite the fact that no notice of entry of judgment had been theretofore given. On June 10, 1930, counsel for respondents served and filed his notice of intention to move for a new trial. Counsel for appellants filed written objections to the hearing of said motion on the ground that said notice of intention had not been filed within the time allowed by law, but the trial court made its order granting said motion on July 26, 1930.

Appellants have presented a brief urging several grounds for reversal. On the other hand no brief has been filed on behalf of respondents and counsel for respondents has communicated with this court saying, “I doubt very much whether a brief will be filed on behalf of respondents”. In our opinion the order must be reversed and we need…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.