Schermerhorn

Schermerhorn v. Los Angeles Pacific Railroad

Good Law
18 Cal. App. 454·1912 Cal. App. LEXIS 302·123 P. 351
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 4, 1912Civ. No. 1068.California534 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

James, J.

Plaintiff in this action suffered personal injuries through the occurrence of a collision between an automobile in which he was riding and a car of defendant company. He brought a separate action to recover damages sustained by reason of the injury to his automobile, in which judgment was rendered in the sum of $700. This action, being one to recover for the personal injuries suffered, came to trial after judgment had been rendered and satisfied in the first-mentioned cause. In the course of the trial of this action the plaintiff offered in evidence the judgment-roll in the other action referred to for the purpose of showing an adjudication of some of the facts involved in the cause then on trial, which evidence was admitted by the court. The jury found that plaintiff had been damaged in his person in the sum of $6,000, and judgment was entered accordingly. On this appeal but one point is made in support of the contention of appellant that a reversal should be ordered: It is insisted that where damage has been caused to the person and property of an individual by the same tortious act committed by another, separate actions cannot be brought to recover the different damages so…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.