McBride

McBride v. Clara Barton Hospital

Good Law
1925 Cal. App. LEXIS 108·75 Cal. App. 161·241 P. 941
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 10, 1925Docket No. 5242.California3,607 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sturtevant, J.

The plaintiff, a minor, commenced an action to recover damages for burns inflicted on his leg while a patient in the hospital operated by the defendant corporation. The defendant answered; a trial was had in the lower court before a jury; the jury brought in a verdict for $5,000; a judgment was entered for that sum, but on the presentation of a motion for a new trial the plaintiff consented to waive $2,000 of the verdict and that the judgment be reduced to the sum of $3,000. Thereupon the motion for a new trial was denied and the defendant has appealed, bringing up a bill of exceptions.

Mrs. McBride, the mother of the plaintiff, testified: “That at the date of the trial the plaintiff was nine years of age; that in February, 1920, Mr. McBride and I were living at 1147 Benton Way, Los Angeles; we had but one child, Johnnie, and at that time there was nothing the matter with his health except for his tonsils and his nose bothering him; I consulted Dr. Ruddy, who advised that there was a growth in the nose and that it should be removed and that his tonsils should be removed; the doctor advised me to go to the Clara Barton Hospital. Later I called the hospital on the telephone and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.