Birch

Birch v. County of Orange

Good Law
1927 Cal. App. LEXIS 18·88 Cal. App. 82·262 P. 788
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 28, 1927Docket No. 3361.California1,762 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Finch, J.

The plaintiffs brought two actions, under the provisions of section 3819 of the Political Code, to recover excess taxes paid by them under protest for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1916. The actions were consolidated and tried together. Judgment was entered in favor of the defendant and this appeal is from the judgment. In a former trial judgment of nonsuit was entered. That judgment was reversed on appeal. (Birch v. County of Orange, 186 Cal. 736 [ 200 Pac. 647 ].) The second trial was had upon the same pleadings as the first.

The plaintiffs own a tract of oil land about a quarter of a mile in length from north to south and an eighth of a mile wide, containing 21.16 acres. This land is bounded on the north by lands of the Crown of the Valley Oil Company, under lease to the Columbia Oil Producing Company; on the east by those of the Brea Canyon Oil Company; on the south by those of the General Petroleum Company, and on the west by those of the Pullerton Oil Company. These surrounding holdings are much larger in area than that of the plaintiffs. This fact is not of great significance, however, because only parts of such surrounding lands have been proved to contain oil and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.