Conrad

Conrad v. Foerst

Good Law
1921 Cal. App. LEXIS 566·54 Cal. App. 277·201 P. 795
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 1921Civ. No. 3930.California810 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kerrigan, J.

Action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Plaintiff contracted with defendant to furnish all the work on a two-story and basement frame building with certain exceptions for the sum of $4,644, payable at specified times as the work progressed. Plaintiff entered upon the performance of the contract, and thereafter, so it is alleged, completed all the conditions on his part to be performed. Notice of completion of work was filed, and thereafter the architect delivered to plaintiff a certificate that the last payment mentioned in the contract was due. This payment amounted to the sum of $1,164. Plaintiff also claimed the further sum of $112, alleged to be the reasonable value of certain extra work ordered by defend ant. The sum of $600 was paid by defendant upon these claims, leaving a balance due thereon of $676, for which sum plaintiff filed his claim of lien. The amount not being paid, this action was brought to recover the same.

Defendant, answering, alleged that plaintiff had not performed all the conditions of the contract, and charged that the building was not completed in a good and workmanlike manner as required by the contract, and further that the building was never…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.