Egan

People v. Egan

Good Law
135 Cal. App. 479·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 275·27 P.2d 412
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 28, 1933Docket No. 1754.California453 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

--The, J.

appellant Frank J. Egan and Albert J. Tinnin were tried jointly and found guilty of first degree murder, the jury fixing the penalty at life imprisonment; and on September 14, 1932, they were sentenced ae cordingly. Throughout the trial they were represented by separate counsel, and each filed a separate notice of appeal. Egan’s notice was filed the day sentence was pronounced, but he took no steps whatever to obtain a record on appeal; and on July 24, 1933, the attorney-general moved for a dismissal.

Section 7 of Rule II of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal, relating to appeals in criminal cases, provides: “ . . . the appellant must, within five days after giving notice of the appeal, file with the clerk and present an application to the trial court, stating in general terms the grounds of the appeal and the points upon which the appellant relies, and designate what portions of the phonographic reporter’s notes it will be necessary to have transcribed to fairly present the points relied upon. If such application is not filed within said time, the appeal shall be dismissed. ...” As indicated, no such application was ever filed or presented by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.