Holman

Holman v. Musser

Good Law
1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 161·59 Cal. App. 734·212 P. 33
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 23, 1922Civ. No. 4341.California1,519 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Langdon, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover $500, money paid by him on a contract to purchase from defendant certain real property in Oakand, California, on the ground that the defendant had abandoned and refused to perform said contract. The contract entered into between the parties was dated November 12, 1920, and was as follows:

The foregoing contract was set out in the complaint and it was alleged that Byron S. Arnold Co. was the agent of the defendant; that the contract of purchase and sale was duly signed and ratified by the defendant; that plaintiff paid $500 in reliance upon said contract; that defendant never tendered to plaintiff any deed or conveyance of the title to said property and that on December 16, 1920, defendant notified plaintiff that all his interest in said property was forfeited and the money paid upon the purchase price thereof was forfeited because of the nonpayment of $50 on December 1, 1920.

Defendant answered and admitted the making of the agreement set out in the complaint; denied that the defendant failed to perform any conditions binding upon him; denied that the plaintiff had performed the conditions of his agreement, and specifically…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.