Giometti

Giometti v. Etienne

Good Law
132 Cal. App. 602·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 338·23 P.2d 52
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 15, 1933Docket No. 1223.California2,051 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Andrews, J.

On December 12, 1927, the parties to this action entered into a contract whereby defendant was to erect, upon land which plaintiffs would deed to him, buildings, machinery and equipment for the manufacture and sale of ice. Defendant was to sell this plant and equipment as finally completed to the plaintiffs for the purchase price of $65,000, of which $15,000 was to be cash, the balance to be paid from receipts for the sale of ice made in the plant. An accounting and payment was to be made each week. The balance due to defendant was to bear interest at eight per cent. Then appears this provision:

Title was to remain in defendant until the purchase price was paid in full and in cash. Then follows this language:

Other provisions related to insurance, patents, acceptance, delivery, rights on default, and special provisions as to cost of buildings. Pursuant to the contract the plant was erected and turned over to the plaintiffs on the twenty-seventh day of April, 1928. Plaintiffs thereafter used the plant in the manufacture of ice and made payments from time to time on the contract.

On June 10, 1931, there was due defendant, according to his account, about the sum of $28,000. On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.