Sundberg

Anglo American Land Co. v. Sundberg

Good Law
1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 529·66 Cal. App. 331·225 P. 874
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 25, 1924Civ. No. 4871.California726 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sturtevant, J.

The plaintiff commenced an action to quiet title to two parcels of land located at Larkspur, Marin County, California. It framed its complaint in two counts. The defendants interposed a demurrer as to each count. The trial court overruled the demurrer to the first count, and sustained the demurrer to the second count without leave to amend. Later a judgment was entered up dismissing the cause of action pleaded in the second count. From that judgment the plaintiff has appealed. Under the facts presented in the record we think that the judgment must he affirmed, whether it was erroneous or otherwise, because after an examination of the entire record the court is clearly of the opinion that the ruling of the trial court, if it be conceded to be error, has not resulted in a miscarriage of justice, and in short has not deprived the plaintiff of any substantial right.

The first cause of action pleaded in the amended complaint is a full and complete statement of an ordinary count to quiet title. By overruling the demurrer to that cause of action the trial court properly preserved to the plaintiff all of the rights to which the plaintiff was entitled. In the second count the plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.