Bank of America v. Pacific Ready-Cut Homes, Inc.

Good Law
122 Cal. App. 554·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 1054·10 P.2d 478
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 13, 1932Docket No. 326.California3,467 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Thomson, J.

This is an action to recover a balance due under a contract. The trial court, rendered judgment for the defendant and plaintiff appeals from said judgment.

On April 2, 1928, respondent entered into a contract with the Southern California Edison Company by the terms of which respondent agreed to construct for said California Edison Company two houses and two garages at Vestal, California, and one house and one garage at Baileys, California. On April 9, 1928, E. R. Frey agreed with respondent to construct said buildings for respondent for a cash consideration, respondent to furnish the ready-cut materials. This agreement was in the form of two separate instruments, 1 one relating to the work at Vestal and the other relating to the work at Baileys. Frey applied to appellant for a loan and a loan was made to him by appellant on June 12, 1928, appellant taking as security for the repayment of said loan, and any future loans, an assignment from Frey of said agreement relating to the construction work at Vestal. On June 25, 1928, this loan was paid and another loan of $1,000 was made by appellant to Frey, appellant keeping the same security. On July 31, 1928, this second loan was paid…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.