Hamilton

Hamilton v. San Francisco, Napa & Calistoga Railway

Good Law
1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 465·48 Cal. App. 761·292 P. 323
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 29, 1920Civ. No. 3444.California967 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Brittain, J.

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered upon an order sustaining without leave to amend a general demurrer to the second amended complaint for damages for the alleged negligence of the defendants as joint tort-feasors which resulted in the death of the plaintiff’s wife. The complaint was in two counts. On January 7, 1918, at about 3 o’clock in the afternoon, Mrs. Hamilton was a passenger for hire in an automobile operated by the defendant Petit, doing business and sued herein as California Taxi Service. In taking her to her destination the machine was driven along a driveway which crossed the tracks of the electric railway operated by the other defendant. The rails of the track were some six inches above the roadway of the crossing. The automobile was driven on to the tracks, and, striking the raised rails, was stalled on the track. An electric train running at the speed of about thirty-five miles an hour struck the automobile and dragged it about thi;ee hundred feet. The gasoline and oil in the machine were ignited and Mrs. Hamilton was severely burned. She died as a result of her injuries. It was alleged that the automobile was negligently driven upon the track; that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.