Quick

Lincoln v. Quick

Good Law
133 Cal. App. 433·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 675·24 P.2d 245
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 25, 1933Docket No. 1028.California1,200 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Barnard, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for damages arising from an automobile accident which occurred on July 13, 1931, while the plaintiff was riding as the guest of the defendant. At that time, section 141% of the California Vehicle Act required the plaintiff in such a case to establish intoxication, wilful misconduct or gross negligence on the part of the defendant in order to recover, and the respondent contends that gross negligence was here established.

The appellant did not appear at the trial and the only evidence as to how the accident occurred is found in the testimony of the respondent. He testified that they were riding along a paved highway on a clear dry day between 4 and 5 o’clock in the afternoon; that “we were driving so fast that I know I was very uneasy”; that he told the appellant not to go so fast; that he had been in automobile wrecks before and “most any speed” would make him feel uneasy; that if a car was going above fifteen miles an hour he would rather not be in it; that the appellant did not slow up as the result of his remonstrance; that he did not know how fast the appellant was driving at the time of the accident; that he was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.