Forve

Los Angeles Trust & Savings Bank v. Forve

Good Law
1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 282·45 Cal. App. 298·187 P. 438
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 27, 1919Civ. No. 3138.California1,422 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Langdon, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant, Philip Forve, from a judgment for the plaintiff, and against him, in an action to recover from defendants their respective proportions of an indebtedness due plaintiff from Phoenix Lighting Fixture Company, in which company the defendants each held one-third of the capital stock at the time of the creation of the indebtedness sued upon.

The answer of the appellant denies that the indebtedness sued upon has not been paid, and alleges that each and every part of said indebtedness has been paid. Appellant also sets up in his answer an alleged agreement between himself and the other defendant and one W. G. Hutchinson, the owner of the remainder of the stock, whereby it was agreed that said Hutchinson would buy all the stock owned by said defendants and would pay the indebtedness of the company to the bank and would save said defendants harmless from all liability as stockholders of said corporation. This second defense does not concern us upon appeal, because the trial court found that the plaintiff bank had no knowledge of such an agreement and correctly held that it was not bound thereby.

Judgment was given against each of the defendants in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.