Kane

Los Angeles Land & Water Co. v. Kane

Good Law
1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 839·96 Cal. App. 418·274 P. 380
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 1929Docket No. 6198.California858 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Crail, J.

The plaintiff owned a tract of land containing about two thousand seven hundred acres, located in the San Fernando Valley, which for several years has been within the city limits of Los Angeles and which is subdivided into five-acre lots with streets running through it. The land is composed of the detritus washed down from the mountains, and is covered with a thin layer of soil, except that portion within the two washes or beds of the Big Tejunga Creek. The plaintiff sold lot 2 of block 22 thereof to Homer A. Hansen by a deed which contained the following conditions: “Subject to the condition subsequent that no part of said property shall be used for the manufacture or sale of crushed rock, gravel or sand prior to January 31, 1934.” All other sales in the tract were made subject to the same condition. On May 7, 1924, about seventy-five dwellings had been erected upon those lots. On that date the said Hansen executed a contract oí sale of said lot to the defendant Mrs. Kane, subject to the same condition. She in her turn leased the lot to other defendants, who, with full knowledge of said conditions, began the construction of a rock-crushing plant upon said property in spite of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.