Forester

People v. Forester

Good Law
1916 Cal. App. LEXIS 482·29 Cal. App. 460·155 P. 1022
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 1916Crim. No. 319.California1,080 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Burnett, J.

Appellant was convicted of a violation of section 270 of the Penal Code, in that he “willfully omitted without lawful excuse to furnish necessary food, clothing, shelter and medical attendance for his three minor children by his divorced wife.”

Many points are made by appellant, but as we are satisfied that the cause must be reversed for a failure of proof as to a vital element of the crime charged, it is probable that the other questions will not arise again, and we therefore forego any discussion of them.

It is admitted by the attorney-general that it should be made to appear that the father has the ability to supply what is needed or else a conviction is not supported. Indeed, it is apparent that inability without fault is a “lawful excuse” for the failure to discharge this parental duty. “While it is the duty of a parent to support his children of tender years, yet in order that he be imprisoned for failure to obey an order of the court in connection therewith, it must affirmatively appear that he has the ability to comply with the order of the court.” (In re McCandless, 17 Cal. App. 222 , [ 119 Pac. 199 ].) In that case the petitioner had been committed to the custody of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.