Carroll

Carroll v. Pacific Coast Auto. Assn., Inc.

Good Law
123 Cal. App. 568·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 986·11 P.2d 660
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 19, 1932Docket No. 752.California2,299 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Scovel, J.

The complaint in this action charges the defendant with malicious prosecution. It appears that during the year 1929 plaintiff was employed by defendant in the city of Fresno as a membership and insurance solicitor. During the month of September, 1929, he was transferred to Bakersfield and given the position as general manager of defendant’s branch there. Besides soliciting memberships and insurance plaintiff had supervision over all of defendant’s agents working from the Bakersfield office, collected all moneys, depositing them in Ms own name in the bank and paying all expenses, including commissions earned by the various salesmen. Plaintiff himself was working on a commission basis. Two or three times a week the balance remaining after the payment of expenses and salesmen’s commission was forwarded to the San Francisco office of defendant by plaintiff. Plaintiff sometimes deducted his own commissions before forwarding the balance to the San Francisco office and sometimes forwarded the entire balance, the San Francisco office then sending him a check for his commissions. However, it appears that by the month of January, 1930, defendant was indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $1421…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.