Wicks

Riverdale Mining Co. v. Wicks

Good Law
14 Cal. App. 526·1910 Cal. App. LEXIS 73·112 P. 896
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 19, 1910Civ. No. 712.California3,452 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hart, J.

This is a suit to quiet title to certain land situated in Plumas county.

Plaintiff obtained judgment, from which the defendant has taken this appeal.

The evidence from which the court made its findings of fact is undisputed, 'and may he epitomized as follows:

On and prior to the fourth day of October, 1907, one W. W. Kellogg was the owner of the property in controversy. On said fourth day of October, 1907, Kellogg and wife, by deed, conveyed said property to one Lloyd P. Cornell. Said deed was delivered to said Cornell on the day of its execution, and was recorded on the same day in the office of the county recorder of Plumas county, at twenty minutes past 4 o’clock P. M. Immediately after the delivery of said deed to Cornell, and on the said fourth day of October, 1907, the latter executed a deed to one Augustin S. McDonald, conveying to the latter the property concerned here, and said deed so executed to said McDonald was filed for record in the office of the count;*- recorder of Plumas county at twenty-two minutes past 4 o’clock P. M., on the said fourth day of October, 1907. “On the seventh day of October, 1907, Augustin S. McDonald and wife conveyed the property to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.