Alvarado

Alvarado v. Sunset Supper Club

Good Law
1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 458·57 Cal. App. 640·207 P. 940
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 9, 1922Civ. No. 3894.California834 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

James, J.

This action was brought to recover from defendants an amount of money as damages. Defendants Sunset Supper Club (a corporation), Tony Matowich, and George Morris failed to answer within the time fixed by law after service of summons, and their default was duly entered and judgment taken on May 18, 1921. On the 13th of June, 1921, after notice to the plaintiff, said defendants presented to the superior court their motion to set aside the default and the judgment entered thereon and to be allowed to file an answer. The court made an order granting the motion, conditioned upon said defendants paying to the plaintiff the sum of $33.30 costs, which costs were paid, .The plaintiff has appealed from the order.

In support of the appeal it is argued by counsel for the plaintiff that the showing made by the defendants was insufficient to authorize the trial court to grant the motion. It is contended that the notice of motion was insufficient in its statement of grounds; that the facts shown by the affidavits did not establish that the neglect on the part of the defendants in failing to appear and answer was excusable, and that no sufficient affidavit of merits was presented. The notice of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.