Ex Parte Van Zandt

Good Law
1921 Cal. App. LEXIS 117·52 Cal. App. 38·197 P. 965
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 22, 1921Crim. No. 557.California1,532 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Prewett, J.

The petitioner is held in durance under a warrant issued by a magistrate of the county of San Joaquin, upon a complaint charging him with the crime of forgery. The allegations of the complaint are positive and not on information and belief. [1] He urges the single point in support of his plea for liberty that a magistrate should not, on the complaint alone, unfortified with depositions,, issue a warrant for the arrest of a person charged with the commission of a felony. He cites sections 811, 812, and 813 of the Penal Code as authority for his position. It is, we think, universally conceded that a complaint made upon information and belief must be thus supported. (Ex parte Dimmig, 74 Cal. 164 , [ 15 Pac. 619 ].) While this case is clearly authority for the claim that a complaint based only upon information and belief will not support a 'criminal proceeding, it is, likewise, authority to the effect that the complaint alone may, under proper circumstances, be entirely sufficient.

We quote from that case the following instructive language: “Of course, where there was some evidence upon which the magistrate acted, we would not interfere. It may also, be true that the original…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.