Jimeno

Jimeno v. Commonwealth Home Builders

Good Law
1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 511·47 Cal. App. 660·191 P. 64
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 21, 1920Civ. No. 3187.California1,426 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Finlayson, J.

This is an action for libel. Defendants demurred to plaintiff’s second amended complaint upon the grounds that it does not state a cause of action and that, in certain particulars, it is uncertain, ambiguous, and unintelligible. The demurrer was sustained. Plaintiff declined further to amend, and judgment for defendants was. entered accordingly. From that judgment plaintiff appeals. ■>

The extrinsic circumstances alleged in the complaint by way of inducement and to be considered in connection with the alleged libel are these: Plaintiff, an investment broker, dealing in real estate and mining investments, was, at all times mentioned in the complaint, a stockholder in the defendant corporation, Commonwealth Home Builders, and chairman of a committee of stockholders organized to investigate the affairs of that corporation and protect the rights and interests of all its stockholders. The investigating committee was organized at the instance of plaintiff, with the advice and assistance of one C. E. Norton, a reputable auditor. Prior to the publication complained of, plaintiff was a stockholder in, and had been active in the promotion of, the Stone Chief Mining Company, a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.