Arnold

Section 21, title 2, of the Volstead Law, adopted by our Wright Act, reads in part as follows:

The main question presented by this appeal is whether or not a proprietor of a cafe who himself furnishes no liquor to his guests, but who allows them to consume on his premises liquor which they bring, offends under this section.

The evidence is sufficient to compel us, reviewing the matter on appeal, to consider the following as established facts. The defendant was in charge of a place known as Sharkey’s Cafe, which had a dance floor bordered by banquet rooms and booths, with tables on the edge of the floor. On the night charged in the complaint some 125 guests were in the cafe, many of them drinking intoxicating liquor, some of them drunk, and there was no table but bore liquor or cracked ice and ginger ale. While the drinking was going on the defendant was actively engaged as proprietor of the place, being in and out of the kitchen, passing the booths, waiting at the front entrance, and knew that intoxicating liquor was being brought in and consumed by his patrons.

There was no evidence that any liquor was manufactured, sold or bartered on the premises, or that the defendant kept…