McKelvy

McKelvy v. Martin

Good Law
118 Cal. App. 691·1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 364·5 P.2d 652
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 30, 1931Docket No. 6724.California759 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

York, J.

This is an appeal by defendant Martin from a judgment of $10,000 in favor of plaintiff.

The court found that the plaintiff and the defendant Martin entered into a written agreement with defendant Engelhart, who was the agent of the owner of an insurance agency, for the purchase of said agency for the sum of $30,000; that the price which the owner of the business was willing to take was the sum of $20,000, and that the said owner did in fact receive said sum of $20,000. The court further found that defendant Martin, in order to cheat, wrong and defraud the said plaintiff, made arrangements with defendant Bngelhart whereby the latter was to represent to plaintiff that the actual price of the insurance business was $30,000, and to divide the difference between the represented price and the actual price, to wit: $10,000 —$7,500 to defendant Martin and $2,500 to defendant Bngelhart. As a conclusion of law from the foregoing facts, the court found that the plaintiff was damaged in the sum of $10,000, and judgment was entered for that amount against the defendant Martin. Before the introduction of any evidence, the cause was dismissed as to defendant Bngelhart.

No evidence was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.