Gordon

Gordon v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 928·96 Cal. App. 607·274 P. 578
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 1929Docket No. 6580.California1,010 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Koford, J.

Plaintiffs and respondents by this action foreclosed a chattel mortgage upon hotel furniture. The mortgage was executed by Reynaud and wife as security for the faithful performance of a lease under which they operated the hotel. The appellant, Elise Pfeiffer, held a second chattel mortgage upon the same furniture and upon this appeal claims that, by virtue of an assignment of the lease to defendant Rawlinson by the lessee and by virtue of the consent to the said assignment given by the lessors adding certain conditions, that in legal effect the original lease secured by the said first chattel mortgage was entirely canceled and a new one took its place which was not secured by the first chattel mortgage. For this reason appellant claims that her mortgage should rank first instead of second as decreed by the trial court.

The term of the lease was from March 23, 1925, to October 31, 1930. Reynaud, the original lessee, assigned to Moore after executing the first chattel mortgage. Moore then executed the second mortgage to appellant, Elise Pfeiffer. About six months later Moore assigned the lease to defendant Marie Rawlinson and the plaintiffs and respondents being then the owners of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.