Logan

Logan v. City of Glendale

Good Law
132 Cal. App. 169·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 219·22 P.2d 552
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 22, 1933Docket No. 9017.California1,129 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nourse, J.

Plaintiffs sued for an injunction to restrain defendant from proceeding under the Vrooman Act (Stats. 1885, p. 147; Peering’s Gen. Laws, Act 8194) to improve portions of Brand Boulevard with an ornamental electric lighting system. Defendants had judgment and the plaintiffs have appealed upon typewritten transcripts.

In their opening brief the appellants assigned six questions as involved on the appeal. The first assignment reads: “Is an ornamental electric street lighting system a public utility or a part of the plant and equipment of a public utility!” As our answer to this question requires an affirmance of the judgment it is unnecessary to pass upon the other assignments. The charter of the city of Glendale authorizes the city authorities to construct, maintain and operate public utilities and for that purpose creates a public service department and a public service sinking fund, which fund “shall be used only for the replacement, betterment, and extensions of the plants and equipment of said public utilities respectively”. (Art. XI, sec. 17, Stats. 1931, p. 2695.) Article XXIII, section 6, of the charter provides: “The improvement, widening and opening of streets, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.