Weyse

Weyse v. Biedebach

Good Law
1927 Cal. App. LEXIS 304·86 Cal. App. 736·261 P. 1092
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 15, 1927Docket No. 4775.California2,427 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Craig, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant Biedebach from the same judgment from which the plaintiffs and respondents herein appealed in Weyse v. Biedebach, Civil No. 4596, decided by this court on November 15, 1927, and reported ante, p. 712 [ 261 Pac. 1086 ]. Respondents also appealed from orders relieving Biedebach from default and allowing him to file his bill of exceptions, and settling the same, in this appeal. (Weyse v. Biedebach, ante, p. 712 [ 261 Pac. 1086 ].)

The first point here to be decided is as to whether or not the parties plaintiff were legally empowered to maintain this suit to quiet title. It is contended by appellant, and appears from the record, that on April 21, 1910, the articles of incorporation of the Antioak Leather Company provided for a board of directors consisting of seven members; and that on that date by a resolution of all of its stockholders, it was voted that this number be diminished to five directors, and on the same date by unanimous vote a board of five members was elected, consisting of H. G. Weyse, A. W. Hutton, J. C. Hentzy, W. E. Hutton and Allan Melrose, the five plaintiffs in this suit. At that time the Civil Code, sections 290 and 362,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.