Eberhart

Eberhart v. Salazar

Good Law
1925 Cal. App. LEXIS 607·71 Cal. App. 336·235 P. 86
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 1925Docket No. 4756.California848 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Knight, J.

This is plaintiff’s appeal from an order vacating and setting aside a default judgment in an action wherein defendants failed to file their amended answer within the time fixed by the order of court, after a demurrer to the original answer had been sustained.

The record discloses that the court by ex parte order had extended defendants’ time to file said amended pleading' until and including Friday, March 30, 1923. On the day following, Saturday, March 31, 1923, the amended pleading, not then having been filed, the clerk of said court, at plaintiff’s request, entered judgment by default against said defendants. On April 11, 1923, defendants served notice of motion to set aside said default judgment, and pursuant to an order shortening time, said motion was heard on April 13, 1923, and, on May 8, 1923, was granted.

It appears from the affidavit presented in support of defendants’ motion to vacate said default judgment that said amended pleading was mailed in San Francisco on March 30, 1923, by defendants’ attorney to the county clerk of Contra Costa County, at Martinez, and it is averred in said affidavit that the distance from San Francisco to Martinez is thirty-five miles and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.