Rudin

Rudin v. Rea

Good Law
1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 243·33 Cal. App. 665·166 P. 362·166 P.2d 362
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 15, 1917Civ. No. 2046.California458 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Action upon a hond. Judgment went for the defendants, Jas. W. Rea and Y. Koch, and plaintiffs appeal.

The facts of the ease are briefly these: A. F. Palmer was an agent of the King-Richardson Company, a corporation engaged in the business of selling and distributing books, and in the course of that agency sold the books of the King-Richardson Company, received payments on account of such sales, and made and reported collection to the company. It became necessary, according to the rules of the company, for Palmer to give a bond for the faithful performance* of his duties as such agent, and he gave the bond upon which this suit is brought, signed by the sureties Koch and Rea. Subsequently Palmer was found to be indebted to his employer in a considerable sum of money, and, without the knowledge of his sureties upon the bond, -and without any information imparted to .them, an arrangement was entered into between the King-Richardson Company and Palmer by which the latter undertook to transfer to his employer certain securities in settlement of his obligation and liability to it. Some considerable time after that arrangement had been made it was discovered that Palmer had embezzled…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.