Meighan

Meighan v. Baker

Good Law
119 Cal. App. 582·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 167·6 P.2d 1015
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 1932Docket No. 7621.California766 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Tyler, J.

Action for damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff was riding as a guest of defendant in an automobile owned and operated by him. While traversing the highway, defendant collided with a cement base of a wigwag signal at a railroad crossing, wrecking his ear. The accident happened at Schuetzen Park crossing, south of San Jose, about 4 o ’clock A. M. In consequence of the collision, plain tiff suffered a broken arm and other injuries. The case was tried before a jury, resulting in a verdict in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $1,000. From said verdict and the judgment entered thereunder, defendant appeals.

It is claimed that the evidence is insufficient to justify the verdict; that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. Error of the court in its instructions to the jury is also relied upon for a reversal.

The basis of defendant’s liability is founded upon the statutory enactment known as section 141% of the California Vehicle Act, as amended in 1929 (Stats. 1929, p. 1580). The provisions of this act in substance provide that any person, who as a guest accepts a ride in any vehicle upon any of the public highways of the state, and while so riding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.